![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jury's justification: Among the finalists, there were almost unanimously projects that opened a more general topic. A topic that most residents of the Czech Republic encounter daily; yet, or perhaps precisely because of that, it remains invisible to us. From this perspective, the author opens a topic that is fundamental, significant, and truly ignored. The railway and the adjacent spaces to it. She presents several solutions in selected locations that vary in size, scale, approach, and quality. The jury recommends that the author continue to pursue this topic (possibly in the form of a doctoral study). It is so fundamental that it deserves a deeper exploration of opportunities. The analytical phase of the project, as it was presented, is not very persuasive. Nonetheless, the jury came to the conclusion that in terms of fulfilling the evaluation criteria, this was the most successful project in the competition.
Description: Utilization of existing railway lines, which have proven to be one of the most effective means for transporting oversized or heavy cargo, and thus carry potential. / Verification of the possibility of incorporating the railway into today's hectic human life. / Design of modular units and modifiable structures. Use of new technologies. / Demonstration of design on typical examples of railway infrastructure and its surroundings. Utilization of the railway bed, rail accessories, unused train stations, adjacent brownfields, their sidings, etc. Task description: New possibilities for using railway lines and adjacent unused areas. Design of modular structures tailored to selected locations. Use of new technologies.
![]() |
Jury's justification: Conversion of a deteriorating complex in Prague's Holešovice. The jury appreciated the straightforward reconstruction and creative character of the new use - the authors designed multifunctional spaces for a public workshop, co-working offices, experimental architecture workshops, as well as apartments and studios. It creates a space for personal meetings, creative work, knowledge transfer, and sharing. An idea that can revive other neglected corners of Czech cities in various forms.
Description: The story of WWWWERK is best expressed by the following sequence of events: You find out - you come - you learn - you design - you buy materials - you produce - you eat - you drink - you meet - you establish a studio - you exhibit - you sell - you find accommodation - you teach others. All these activities, however, are framed by one important principle - YOU WORK. Before WWWWERK, there was the abandoned B. H. Hellmann factory. Old workshops, mysterious cellars, storages, an alley, a run-down apartment building, a dormitory, a nail studio, a grocery store, junk, a huge gap, walls on the verge of collapse, a “sieve-like” roof, and pervasive rot. All of this is now located in Prague's Holešovice at Tusarova 31. We propose a conversion and meaningful utilization of the entire complex. A shared public workshop, materials store, co-working offices, experimental architecture workshop, apartments, rentable studios, or workshops, and a showroom with a café will be created here. Thus, WWWWERK is born with a unique and pure concept: to transform a workshop into a workshop.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jury's justification: The jury perceives this work as very provocative. It addresses the very core of historic Prague with a revision of spatial relationships that everyone considers complete, valid, and immutable, highlighting problems we have become accustomed to accepting as facts. It also seeks to uncover new potentials that few suspect. At first glance, the striking architectural gesture of the new building is astounding. Moreover, it serves as the headquarters of an institution opposing the conservative view embodied by the Club for Old Prague, located "on the opposite bank." Upon closer examination, we discover that it is not a self-serving provocation but a thoughtful result of an investigative and critical approach to a site that is, for many, a sacred icon. Such a perspective may provoke many, but it can also inspire them.
Description: The purpose of this work was to respond to the currently poorly addressed area of Křižovnické náměstí, whose modifications over the last centuries do not correspond to its importance and to find the form of a strategically located object for the Club for Prague on the opposite bank from the Club for Old Prague in Malá Strana. The proposal includes a descending staircase ending above the river level, replacing the current volume between Charles Bridge and the museum. The stepped surface creates a barrier dividing the busy Křižovnická street from the riverbank. The stairs are separated from the bridge by a wedge – the building of the club. The position of the club corresponds to the location of the original customs office standing on the first pillar of Charles Bridge and defines the axis that opens the view from Karlova street. The building's ground floor partially transforms into a permeable arcade that frees up the space in front of the bridge. From the square, the existence of the club is only marked by a door and a window of the club president's office. Next to the main entrance from the square, access is possible through a stairway around the exposed pillar into the main hall. This is indirectly illuminated by an arched skylight directed towards Hradčany.
S32 / Reconstruction of the Varšava Cinema in Liberec
Authors: Ing. arch. Jiří Žid, Ing. arch. Zuzana Koňasová, Ing. arch. Ondřej Pleštil, Ph.D.
Company: Association to Save Varšava Cinema
![]() |
![]() |
Jury's justification: In this case, the jury appreciated particularly the precision of the submission form, which clearly references its retro conception to a number of utopian projects from the early 1970s. In this case, it is not about utopia, nor is it a pragmatic solution. The dichotomy between these two extremes permeates the entire work, but the jury is not convinced that the author is aware of it. Nevertheless, the jury appreciated the author's effort to create a connection between several seemingly contradictory phenomena, even though reality has already shown that this may not be possible in this location.
Description: This project attempts to reconcile the modernist past of southwestern London with its pragmatic developmental future. Demolition is not necessary. There is room for both – the utopian housing estate from the 1960s and the proposed shopping center. The Ruin and the Mall. What is necessary is a third - an infrastructural element that would connect and separate these two worlds at the same time. A formal element that allows them to retain their autonomous qualities while balancing out their notorious flaws. A grid of walls. Their peaks recreate that utopian world. Closed, an island, torn from the context of the city. The aesthetic of the grid strengthens the abstract scale of modernist slabs. Together they create a park. Below is a completely different world. Through a series of openings and exceptions, the unbroken grid crumbles into a warped labyrinth of the shopping center. An endless two-way enfilade of commercial spaces.
![]() |
Jury's justification: The work represents, rather than a specific architectural design, a method. A method of investigating potentials in urban structures. At a time when cities experience extensive development, it comes with the effort to review the internal reserves and potentials of already urbanized land. In addition to inventory and balance, the proposal also offers a strategy for initiating this sleeping potential. Very sympathetic about the proposal is that it does not see the revitalization of forgotten places as a necessary building but offers gradual steps, varying in investment demand. The proposed strategy is communicated in a form that professionals might find excessively stylized and pop-like, but which may, due to that, be understandable even to lay people. And that is an important positive in the time of emancipation of self-governments, increasing civic engagement, and participation.
Description: The work focuses on introducing the issue of gaps in contemporary cities, specifically on gaps in the broader center of Brno. The work is divided into three sections - analysis, strategy, and design part. The analytical part focuses on gaps in the broader center of Brno and their categorization using a general typology created for this purpose, which categorizes the gaps and may help in the actual design. The typology is followed by a strategy for possible uses of the potential of the gaps during their gradual transformation into public spaces before potential building. This is described in the form of a kind of “first aid kit” containing individual phases of place recovery that can connect or become a final phase. For comparison, the phases are labeled as pain pills, disinfection, resuscitation, bandage, and operation. The design part implements the methods of the “first aid kit” on three selected typological gaps in Brno, located in the city center, along the ring road, and outside.
![]() |