Prague - The Libeň Bridge in Prague, designed by architect Pavel Janák, should be sensitively reconstructed according to the Institute of Planning and Development (IPR). Petr Hlaváček, the director of IPR, announced this today to ČTK. The institute also questioned the conclusions of the ČVUT study, which claimed that building a new bridge would be cheaper for the city. Moreover, the new building would supposedly last longer. The leadership of Prague is currently debating whether to repair the bridge, which is in a state of emergency, or demolish it and construct a new one on its pillars. Traffic is restricted on the bridge due to its condition.
"We support the option of a sensitive reconstruction and the restoration of the original architectural form, even if this option proves to be more expensive. Janák’s bridge represents an unjustly neglected architectural value, the preservation of which at higher costs and longer time is definitely worth it. The final result is what matters,” said Hlaváček.
Prague published the conclusions of the study by the Klokner Institute of ČVUT, where experts evaluated both options, demolition and reconstruction. They considered it more advantageous to build a new expanded bridge on the pillars of the current one. It is supposed to be cheaper and last longer without repairs. IPR Prague disagrees with the findings of the study.
"We are glad that Deputy Mayor Petr Dolínek opened the debate on the future of the bridge. However, we find the results of the study unfortunate. As can be read in the expert report, the Klokner Institute hardly dealt with the reconstruction option,” stated the director.
According to IPR, the argument that it is necessary to quickly choose one of the options and start building due to the emergency condition does not hold either. "The bridge can be closed for some time until an ideal solution is found. Tram traffic could be rerouted through a temporary structure in the meantime. This is better than irreparably destroying the bridge without proper consideration,” said Hlaváček.
According to him, this step is also supported by the fact that both banks are development areas. "On the Libeň side, a new urban quarter will eventually emerge, which will include not only residential and office buildings but also extensive park areas. Today, the bridge is important for traffic, but over time it will very likely become an essential pedestrian route. The uniqueness of its architectural design will regain significance,” he stated.
If it ultimately turns out that the bridge is irreparable, IPR believes it is necessary to announce an international architectural competition for a new bridge. "Building a replica or just using the original pillars seems undignified to us. If Prague decides to demolish Pavel Janák’s work, it must attempt to replace it with an equally high-quality piece of contemporary architecture,” Hlaváček stated.
The city has been planning the repair for several years. In 2009, the authorities issued a building permit, which was extended four years later until the end of this year. However, construction has still not started. According to the TSK report from two years ago, the Libeň Bridge is in the worst condition of all Prague bridges. Since it was put into operation in 1928, its load-bearing structure has never been repaired. The authors of the Libeň Bridge, which connects Holešovice and Libeň, are architect and cubist Pavel Janák and engineer František Mencl.